{"id":5972,"date":"2026-05-23T11:48:16","date_gmt":"2026-05-23T09:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kidstoo.ch\/publications\/type-de-publications\/publications-internes\/indicateurs-k2-graphes\/"},"modified":"2026-05-23T12:02:29","modified_gmt":"2026-05-23T10:02:29","slug":"indicateurs-k2-graphes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kidstoo.ch\/en\/nos-publications\/rapports-un-autre-regard\/indicateurs-k2-graphes\/","title":{"rendered":"Indicateurs “K2”-Graphes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Changes in indicators over time<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

SDG 5.2 indicators measuring severe domestic violence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The official indicator for serious domestic violence shows such a low number of victims that it cannot motivate politicians to do anything, let alone reasonably commit adequate resources.
What’s more, the proportion of women affected is downplayed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

SDG 16.1 indicators measuring severe violence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The official indicator takes into account all violent offences considered severe. It shows the total of domestic violence and violence \u2018outside the walls\u2019 or \u2018non-domestic\u2019. The \u2018K2\u2019 versions of this indicator, if they extract the figures specific to domestic violence, consider a greater number of types of offence to be severe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The number of people subjected to severe offences is 2 to 3 times higher “away from home” than “at home”. The proportion of women injured \u2018away from home\u2019, while lower than \u2018at home\u2019, is still two-thirds for the K2.1 version of the indicator.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

SDG indicator 5.6 measuring psychological violence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The number of victims of domestic violence is unfortunately on an upward trend.
The proportion of women who are victims of domestic violence, at around 75-80%, has fallen slightly but steadily over the period analysed.
The proportion of women victims of \u2018non-domestic\u2019 violence, between 43% and 38%, is also falling slightly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Currently, it is not possible to pinpoint the cause of these falls. Among the hypotheses that could be retained, the main ones are:
– at the level of data entry into the SPC, insofar as more serious offences are recorded, do offences of psychological violence \u2018deserve\u2019 to be mentioned?
– in the case of perpetrators of systematic violence, does a complaint or counter-complaint make it possible to shift some of the burden onto the primary victim? This could explain the greater drop in domestic violence.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Victimisation and control (“emprise”) indicators<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For these two indicators, a fall would be equivalent to an improvement in the situation of victims. This is not really the case. In fact, it’s REALLY NOT the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Changes in indicators over time SDG 5.2 indicators measuring severe domestic violence The official indicator for serious domestic violence shows such a low number of victims that it cannot motivate politicians to do anything, let alone reasonably commit adequate resources.What’s more, the proportion of women affected is downplayed. SDG 16.1 indicators measuring severe violence The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"parent":6172,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5972","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t